Prompt Library

Summarise the document below for {{audience}} in about {{length}} words.

"""
{{document}}
"""

Rules:
- Every factual claim in your summary must be followed by a short direct quote
  from the document in [square brackets] that supports it.
- If you can't find a supporting quote, don't make the claim.
- Keep numbers exactly as written in the source, including units.
- After the summary, list:
  a) anything important the document leaves unclear or unsupported
  b) any claims in the document that would be worth checking elsewhere

If the document is too long to read carefully in full, tell me which
sections you prioritised.

Here's an academic paper (or its abstract, methods and results):

"""
{{paper text}}
"""

Explain it to me as a smart reader from outside the field ({{my background}}).

1. The question they asked, in one sentence.
2. What they actually did, step by step, with no jargon (or define it).
3. What they found, with the key numbers and what those numbers mean.
4. What the paper does NOT show, even though a headline might claim it does.
5. How strong the evidence is: sample size, controls, replication.
6. Three questions I should ask if I'm going to cite this.

If any part depends on figures or tables you can't see, tell me.

The question: {{contested question}}

I lean towards: {{your current view, or "undecided"}}

1. Write the strongest case FOR, as its most thoughtful supporter would
   make it. 150 words, no strawmen.
2. Write the strongest case AGAINST, the same way. 150 words.
3. List the key factual disagreements versus the key value disagreements.
   (Facts can be checked; values have to be argued.)
4. Name the single piece of evidence that would most change the debate,
   and whether it exists.
5. Point out where my current lean might be weakest.

Stay neutral in sections 1 and 2. Be candid in section 5.

I'm researching {{topic}} for {{purpose: essay, report, decision}}.
Here are my notes and sources so far:

"""
{{notes}}
"""

Act as a tough but fair reviewer. Tell me:

1. The three biggest gaps: questions my notes don't answer but should.
2. Claims resting on a single source.
3. Perspectives or stakeholders missing entirely.
4. Anything that looks outdated or that I should double-check.
5. Two specific kinds of sources that would strengthen this most
   (describe them; don't invent titles or authors).

Rank everything by how much it would hurt the final piece if left unfixed.